There’s another Medicaid reimbursement case being argued at the Miss.S.Ct. at 1:30. It’s Memorial Hospital at Gulfport and Singing River vs the Division of Medicaid.
Medicaid frames the issues thusly:
1.Was the Chancery Court correct in finding that DOM’s application of its FY 2014 model
paying DSH and UPL supplemental payments to hospitals was neither arbitrary nor
capricious and that it fully complied with Miss. Code Ann. §§ 43-13-117(A)(18) and 43-
13-145, as well as with the Medicaid State Plan and federal law?
2. Does the alternate DSH and UPL model presented by Singing River and Memorial
comply with Mississippi and federal law?
3. Can the Court, on appellate review of a state agency administrative decision, use public policy arguments as the basis to change clear and unambiguous state law?
Memorial Hospital’s brief
Memorial Hospital’s reply brief
Watch the argument here